Sabtu, 15 Januari 2011

EDUCATION

The character of Indonesia's educational system reflects its diverse religious heritage, its struggle for a national identity, and the challenge of resource allocation in a poor but developing archipelagic nation with a young and rapidly growing population. Although a draft constitution stated in 1950 that a key government goal was to provide every Indonesian with at least six years of primary schooling, the aim of universal education had not been reached by the late 1980s, particularly among females--although great improvements had been made. Obstacles to meeting the government's goal included a high birth rate, a decline in infant mortality, and a shortage of schools and qualified teachers. In 1973 Suharto issued an order to set aside portions of oil revenues for the construction of new primary schools. This act resulted in the construction or repair of nearly 40,000 primary school facilities by the late 1980s, a move that greatly facilitated the goal of universal education.

Primary and Secondary Education

Following kindergarten, Indonesians of between seven and twelve years of age were required to attend six years of primary school in the 1990s. They could choose between state-run, nonsectarian public schools supervised by the Department of Education and Culture or private or semiprivate religious (usually Islamic) schools supervised and financed by the Department of Religious Affairs. However, although 85 percent of the Indonesian population was registered as Muslim, according to the 1990 census, less than 15 percent attended religious schools. Enrollment figures were slightly higher for girls than boys and much higher in Java than the rest of Indonesia.
A central goal of the national education system in the early 1990s was not merely to impart secular wisdom about the world, but also to instruct children in the principles of participation in the modern nation-state, its bureaucracies, and its moral and ideological foundations. Since 1975, a key feature of the national curriculum--as in other parts of society--had been instruction in the Pancasila. Children age six and above learned its five principles--belief in one God, humanitarianism, national unity, democracy, and social justice--by rote and were instructed daily to apply the meanings of this key national symbol to their lives. The alleged communist coup attempt in 1965 provided a vivid image of transgression against the Pancasila. Partly to prove their rejection of communist ideology, all teachers--like other members of Indonesian bureaucracy--swore allegiance not only to the Pancasila, but to the government party of functional groups.
Inside the public school classroom of the early 1990s, a style of pedagogy prevailed that emphasized rote learning and deference to the authority of the teacher. Although the youngest children were sometimes allowed to use the local language, by the third year of primary school nearly all instruction was conducted in formal Indonesian. Instead of asking questions of the students, a standard teaching technique was to narrate a historical event or to describe a mathematical problem, pausing at key junctures to allow the students to fill in the blanks. By not responding to individual problems of the students and retaining an emotionally distanced demeanor, the teacher is said to be sabar (patient), which is considered admirable behavior.
Nationally, the average class size in primary schools was approximately twenty-seven, while upper-level classes included between thirty and forty students. Ninety-two percent of primary school students graduated, but only about 60 percent of those continued on to junior high school (ages thirteen through fifteen). Of those who went on to junior high school, 87 percent also went on to a senior high school (ages sixteen through eighteen). The national adult literacy rate remained at about 77 percent in 1991 (84 percent for males and 68 percent for females), keeping Indonesia tied with Brunei for the lowest literacy among the six member nations of the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
In the early 1990s, after completion of the six-year primary school program, students could choose among a variety of vocational and preprofessional junior and senior high schools, each level of which was three years in duration. There were academic and vocational junior high schools that could lead to senior-level diplomas. There were also "domestic science" junior high schools for girls. At the senior high-school level, there were three-year agricultural, veterinary, and forestry schools open to students who had graduated from an academic junior high school. Special schools at the junior and senior levels taught hotel management, legal clerking, plastic arts, and music.
Teacher training programs were varied, and were gradually upgraded. For example, in the 1950s anyone completing a teacher training program at the junior high level could obtain a teacher's certificate. Since the 1970s, however, the teaching profession was restricted to graduates of a senior high school for teachers in a primary school and to graduates of a university-level education course for teachers of higher grades. Remuneration for primary and secondary school teachers compared favorably with countries such as Malaysia, India, and Thailand. Student-teacher ratios also compared favorably with most Asian nations at 25.3 to 1 and 15.3 to 1, respectively, for primary and secondary schools in the mid-1980s when the averages were 33.1 to 1 and 22.6 to 1 for Asian-Pacific countries.

Islamic Schools

The emphasis on the Pancasila in public schools has been resisted by some of the Muslim majority. A distinct but vocal minority of these Muslims prefer to receive their schooling in apesantren or residential learning center. Usually in rural areas and under the direction of a Muslim scholar, pesantren are attended by young people seeking a detailed understanding of the Quran, the Arabic language, the sharia, and Muslim traditions and history. Students could enter and leave the pesantren any time of the year, and the studies were not organized as a progression of courses leading to graduation. Although not all pesantren were equally orthodox, most were and the chief aim was to produce good Muslims.
In order for students to adapt to life in the modern, secular nation-state, the Muslim-dominated Department of Religious Affairs advocated the spread of a newer variety of Muslim school, themadrasa. In the early 1990s, these schools integrated religious subjects from the pesantren with secular subjects from the Western-style public education system. The less-than 15 percent of the school-age population who attended either type of Islamic schools did so because of the perceived higher quality instruction. However, among Islamic schools, a madrasa was ranked lower than a pesantren. Despite the widespread perception in the West of resurgent Islamic orthodoxy in Muslim countries, the 1980s saw little overall increase in the role of religion in school curricula in Indonesia.
In general, Indonesia's educational system still faced a shortage of resources in the 1990s. The shortage of staffing in Indonesia's schools was no longer as acute as in the 1950s, but serious difficulties remained, particularly in the areas of teacher salaries, teacher certification, and finding qualified personnel. Providing textbooks and other school equipment throughout the farflung archipelago continued to be a significant problem as well.

Higher Education

Indonesia's institutions of higher education have experienced dramatic growth since independence. In 1950 there were ten institutions of higher learning, with a total of 6,500 students. In 1970 there were 450 private and state institutions enrolling 237,000 students, and by 1990 there were 900 institutions with 141,000 teachers and nearly 1,486,000 students. Public institutions enjoyed a considerably better student-teacher ratio (14 to 1) than private institutions (46 to 1) in the mid-1980s. Approximately 80 to 90 percent of state university budgets were financed by government subsidies, although the universities had considerably more autonomy in curriculum and internal structure than primary and secondary schools. Whereas tuition in such state institutions was affordable, faculty salaries were low by international standards. Still, university salaries were higher than primary and secondary school salaries. In addition, lecturers often had other jobs outside the university to supplement their wages.
Private universities were operated by foundations. Unlike state universities, private institutions had budgets that were almost entirely tuition driven. Each student negotiated a one-time registration fee--which could be quite high--at the time of entry. If a university had a religious affiliation, it could finance some of its costs through donations or grants from international religious organizations. The government provided only limited support for private universities.
Higher education in the early 1990s offered a wide range of programs, many of which were in a state of flux. Nearly half of all students enrolled in higher education in 1985 were social sciences majors. Humanities and science and technology represented nearly 28 percent and 21 percent, respectively. The major degrees granted were the sarjana muda (junior scholar; roughly corresponding to a bachelor's degree) and the sarjana (scholar or master's degree). Very fewdoktor (doctoral) degrees were awarded. Few students studying for the sarjana muda actually finished in one to three years. One study found that only 10 to 15 percent of students finished their course of study on time, partly because of the requirement to complete the traditional skripsi(thesis). In 1988, for instance, 235,000 new students were admitted for sarjana muda-level training and 1,234,800 were enrolled at various stages of the program, but only 95,600 graduated.
Discussion about how to improve Indonesian higher education focused on issues of teacher salaries, laboratory and research facilities, and professor qualifications. According to official figures, in 1984 only 13.9 percent of permanent faculty members at state institutions of higher learning had any advanced degree; only 4.5 percent had a doctorate. Since doctoral programs were rare in Indonesia and there was little money to support education overseas, this situation improved only slowly. Despite these difficulties, most institutions of higher education received large numbers of applications in the late 1980s and early 1990s; in state institutions less than one application in four was accepted. One of the most serious problems for graduates with advanced degrees, however, was finding employment suited to their newly acquired education.
The University of Indonesia, founded in Jakarta in the 1930s, is the nation's oldest university. Other major universities include Gadjah Mada University (Indonesia's oldest postindependence university, founded in 1946) in Yogyakarta; Catholic University and Institut Teknologi Bandung, both in Bandung; and the Institut Pertanian Bogor in Bogor. In the early 1990s, there also were important regional universities in Sulawesi, Sumatera Utara, Jawa Barat, and Irian Jaya.

Education in Indonesia


Education in Indonesia is the responsibility of the Ministry of National Education of Indonesia (Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia/Kemdiknas), formerly the Department of Education and Culture of Indonesia (Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia/Depdikbud). In Indonesia, all citizens must undertake nine years of compulsory education, six years at elementary level and three in junior high school. Islamic schools are the responsibility of the Ministry of Religious Affairs.
Education is defined as a planned effort to establish a study environment and education process so that the student may actively develop his/her own potential to gain the religious and spiritual level, consciousness, personality, intelligence, behaviour andcreativity to him/herself, other citizens and for the nation. The constitution also notes that education in Indonesia is divided into two major parts, formal and non-formal. Formal education is divided again into three levels, primary, secondary and tertiary education.
Schools in indonesia are run either by the government (negeri) or privately (swasta).

School grades

The Indonesian school year usually started in July. One year is divided into two semesters.
Level/GradeTypical age
Preschool
Playgroup3-4
Kindergarten4-6
Elementary School
1st Grade6–7
2nd Grade7–8
3rd Grade8–9
4th Grade9–10
5th Grade10–11
6th Grade11–12
Junior high school
7th grade12-13
8th Grade13-14
9th Grade14-15
Senior high school
10th Grade15–16
11th Grade16–17
12th Grade17–18
Post-secondary education
Tertiary education (College or University)Ages vary (usually four years,
referred to as Freshman,
Sophomore, Junior and
Senior years)


Preschool

From birth until the age of 3, Indonesian children generally do not have access to formal education. From the age of 3 to 4 or 5, they attendkindergarten (Taman Kanak-Kanak). This education is not compulsory for Indonesian citizens, as the aim of this is to prepare them for primary school. Of the forty-nine thousand kindergartens in Indonesia 99.35% are privately operated schools [1]. The kindergarten years are usually divided into "Class A" and "Class B" students spending a year in each Class.

Elementary school

Children ages 6–11 attend Sekolah Dasar (SD) (literally Elementary School). This level of education is compulsory for all Indonesian citizens, based on the national constitution. In contrast to the majority of privately run kindergartens, most elementary schools are government operated public schools, accounting for 93% of all elementary schools in Indonesia[2]. Similar to education systems in the U.S. and Australia, students must study for six years to complete this level. Some schools offer an accelerated learning program, where students who perform well can finish elementary school in five years.
Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) is the Islamic alternative to SD, following a curriculum with more focus on Arabic and Islam.

Junior high school

Junior High school, generally known by the abbreviation "SMP" (Sekolah Menengah Pertama) is part of primary education in Indonesia. After graduating from elementary school, students attend Middle School for three years from the age of 12-14. After three years of schooling and graduation, students may move on to Senior High School.
Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MT) is the Islamic equivalent of SMP.

Senior High School

A public high school in Jakarta
In Indonesia, there are two types of senior high school. First is generally known as by the abbreviation "SMA" (Sekolah Menengah Atas) and second is SMK (Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan). SMA differ than SMK in their studies. The students at SMA are prepared to continue their study to university while students of SMK are prepared to be ready to work after finishing their school without going to university/college. SMA is simply the university-preparatory school while SMK is the vocational school. Based on the national constitution, Indonesian citizens do not have to attend high school as the citizens only require nine years of education. This is also reflected by the number of high schools in Indonesia, with just slightly below 9,000 schools[3].
Madrasah Aliyah (MA) is the Islamic equivalent of SMA, and Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan (MAK) the Islamic equivalent of SMK.

Higher education

After graduation from High school or college, students may attend a university (higher education). The higher education institution is categorized in two types: public and private which supervised by Ministry of National Education. There are three types of higher education institution: Universities, Institutes and Academy or college.
There are different degrees in higher education, namely Diploma 3 (D3), Diploma 4 (D4), Strata 1 (S1), Strata 2 (S2) and Strata 3 (S3).
Types of DegreeIndonesian LanguageEnglish Language
D3Ahli MadyaAssociate's Degree
D4SarjanaBachelor's Degree
S1SarjanaBachelor's Degree
S2MagisterMaster's Degree
S3DoktorDoctoral Degree



History

The Dutch introduced a system of formal education for the local population of Indonesia, although this was restricted to certain privileged children. The system they introduced was roughly similar to the current structure, with the following levels:
  • ELS (Dutch: Europeesche Lagere School) - Primary School for Europeans
  • HIS (Dutch: Hollandsch-Inlandsche School) - Primary School for Natives
  • MULO (Dutch: Meer Uitgebreid Lager Onderwijs) - Middle School
  • AMS (Dutch: Algeme(e)ne Middelbare School) - High School or College
By the 1930s, the Dutch had introduced limited formal education to nearly every province of the Dutch East Indies.

Teaching Definite and Indefinite

The truth is that the answer is extremely complex--too complex in fact; it constantly gives me a headache. You could set out to list examples of usage as in Swan's Practical English Usage orFowler's Modern English Usage, but I have a feeling that your students will quickly get lost.

Instead, I would like to propose a few basic rules that your students could get a lot of mileage out of. I would also like to phrase these rules in a non-standard way to make them more accessible for the ESL/EFL audience. Finally, I would also like to provide a few worksheets so that students can get a feel for these rules in use. So keep in mind that the purpose of this article is to simplify an extremely complex system so that it is understood on a basic level by ESL/EFL students and not to account for every usage of articles with nouns in the English language.

The first rule explains when we use 'the' and when we use 'a', 'an', or 'some'. The second rule deals with unique nouns, which usually require a definite article. The third rule explains why we sometimes leave articles out. As I stated above, these three rules represent an over simplification of a complex system, but they are easy to understand (and teach) and ESL/EFL students should be able to grasp them.

Why is it so difficult? I suspect there are several influencing factors. First of all, articles belong to a system of determiners.  And the decision to use an article or not depends on what other determiners you are using along with the noun. And it depends on the context in which you are using the noun. If you look at the list of statements about ducks to the right, it is clear that context and co-occurring determiners are a factor in using (or not) an article. In general, articles should probably not be taught in isolation, but should be included in the wider scope of the system of determiners and that will be the focus of part II on this discussion on articles.

I also suspect adults have a difficult time with articles because the nature of input that they receive is more complicated and rule-breaking compared to the input that children receive. Children deal in concrete nouns and the basic rules usually apply making it easier for children to internalize the rules. Adults on the other hand deal with abstract nouns for which the rules are less clear and sometimes contradictory. And so, children get a foundation from which they learn exceptions and adults see only an apparent random assignment of articles to nouns. But that's just my personal speculation.
Rule 1: Indefinite articles are used for previously unknown nouns that are being introduced into a dialogue or story and definite articles are used for nouns that have already been introduced (or are already known or are assumed to be known at the point of introduction to the conversation).

For example:

I saw a cat. The cat was sitting on a fence. The fence was painted brown. The cat jumped off the fence when it saw amouse. The mouse ran into a hole when it saw the cat so the cat didn't catch the mouse.

In this example, the nouns catfence, and mouse take an indefinite article, but only when they are introduced for the first time. After they are introduced, we use the definite article in every instance. This pattern, or rule, covers a lot of basic instances of concrete nouns, especially in story telling. This rule can extend over long periods of time and interrupted dialogue so that I can ask you to buy a pen and then several hours later I can ask you if you bought the pen.

Of course, this rule cannot be taught at the single sentence level since it requires a sentence to introduce the noun and a sentence to talk about the noun that has previously been introduced.

One exercise that I find useful is to have students fill in the articles for simple stories where several characters and objects are introduced into the story in succession. Every time a new character (knight, cat, ogre, mouse) or a new object (fence, bridge, castle) is introduced into the story the indefinite article is used and thereafter the definite article is used as per the basic rule. (See links above right).

Another good exercise that emphasizes this use of the basic rule is to have a series of flashcards with people or animals doing something and ask the students to describe what they see:

I see a monkey. The monkey is playing the drums.
I see a cat. The cat is swimming.

The pattern can be varied to suit other language needs:

There is a cat. The cat is swimming.

Some other possible ideas for using flashcards like these are:

(a)     Describing colours: I see a cat. The cat is black.
(b)     Describing clothes: There is a girl and a boy. The girl is wearing a dress and the boy is wearing a shirt and jeans.
(c)     Describing actions: I see a knight. The knight is fighting an ogre.
(d)     Describing settings of a story: Once upon a time, there wasa princess. The princess lived in a castle.

If you have to teach the use of articles, then this is the place to begin. This is the basic rule for using articles. In fact, I often tell students that this is the only rule, but there are many exceptions. The problem is that there are so many exceptions that you could spend an inordinate amount of time going over these exceptions.  In the end, students would not be able to internalize these rules anyways so what's the point (except perhaps to provide a reference for writing).
Rule 2: When a Noun is Unique, Use a Definite Article

Another important rule is when something is unique* or, in other words, there is only one of that object. In this case, the definite article is used. The sunthe presidentthe queen of Englandthe capital city, and the moon are all examples. This is especially true for objects that are well known by many or most people, but it is true even when the hearer may not know the object:

A:Who's he?
B:He's the president of Korea. She's the CFO. He's the mayor.

This can be contrasted with:
A: Who's she?
B: She's a member of parliament. She's an accountant. He's an alderman.

This uniqueness can come by association:

A car crashed into a tree. The driver was seriously injured.

Once we established (introduced) the car, there could only be one driver so driver was unique at the time of introduction and we usethe driver instead of a driver. We could have rewritten this so that driver was not unique (and the car was) when it was introduced:

driver was seriously injured when the car he was driving crashed.

A driver can only be driving one car at a time so car is unique in this instance once driver was introduced.

This exception applies to superlatives (which are usually unique in occupying the extreme postion or quality): the best placetheworst thingthe fastest runnerthe tallest mountain, and the most interesting person I've ever met. This can be contrasted with comparatives such as a better mouse trap where several better mouse traps are possible.

This exception also applies to ordering (ordinal numbers used as adjectives) where it is presumed that the ordering is unique: thesecond timethe third examplethe fourth person to call. In other words, once you place an order on objects they hold a unique position in that order.

This exception applies to named things (which through naming become unique):

The Rocky Mountains. (a mountain range)
The New York Islanders. (a sports team)
The Amazon River. (a river in South America)
The Pacific Ocean (An ocean)
The Steelworkers Union (an organization)
The Great Plains (a geographic locality)
The Washington Monument (a statue)
The Number Four Bus

However, this application is imperfect as some things such as named lakes and islands take no articles (Buttle Lake, Skull Island) except in plural instances (the Great Lakes, the Galapagos islands).

This exception applies to famous people who become unique in their fame:

A: I saw Nicole Kidman yesterday.
B: Nicole Kidman, the actor? (There is only one famous Nicole Kidman)

The links above right cover some of the applications of this exception.
Rule 3: When we are speaking of a noun in general weusually leave the article out and, if it is countable, use the plural form.*

So for example, when we are talking about an actual cookie or cookies that really exist or existed we use an article (definite or indefinite). In the following examples, we are speaking of specific/actual/real cookies.

I ate a cookie.
The cookie was delicious.
The cookies are on the table.
I made some cookies for you.

However, we can also make general statements about cookies. And when we do speak in general of cookies, we leave the articles out.

I like cookies.
Cookies contain a lot of sugar.
Kids shouldn't eat cookies everyday.
I enjoy making cookies.
I never eat cookies at night.

It is possible to either use an article or leave it out, but the meaning will be different in each case:

I like cookies.
(A general statement concerning cookies)
I like the cookies.
(A statement about some specific cookies that I've actually tasted)

It should be noted that when we do speak in general wecommonly use the plural form** of the noun if it is a countable noun (and just the noun if it is not countable).

Cookies are bad for your health.
(Cookie is countable and therefore put into the plural)

Pizza is bad for your health.
(Pizza is uncountable and left as is)

The links to right contain examples where students decide whether the statements are general statements or whether they are about actual objects, but they are really 'best guess' exercises since both statements I like cookies and I like the cookies are grammatically correct but are different in meaning (one is specific and one is general).